Vail, Alterra sued over lift ticket prices
DENVER – Four skiers have filed a class-action lawsuit against Broomfield-based Vail Resorts Inc. and Denver-based Alterra Mountain Co., accusing the companies of exploiting their grip on the industry to artificially inflate the cost of skiing and snowboarding across the country.
According to Reuters, the lawsuit, filed Monday in U.S. District Court in Denver, said Vail (NYSE: MTN) and Alterra, which own or operate 60 ski areas around the country, are violating federal antitrust law by bundling access to resorts in their multi-mountain season passes. The plaintiffs, three from Colorado and one from Massachusetts, allege both companies set high single-day lift ticket prices to steer consumers into purchasing higher-priced multi-mountain season passes.
In a statement, Vail said the claims in the lawsuit are without merit. Vail said its multi-resort Epic Pass was launched in 2008 to make skiing more accessible and reduced the price of a season pass by 60%. The company also said it has launched new, lower-priced pass options in recent years.
Alterra, which is privately owned by KSL Capital Partners and Henry Crown and Co., owners of Aspen/Snowmass, declined to comment.
The lawsuit said it seeks class-action status for potentially millions of skiers and snowboarders in the United States and its territories.
The case is Goloja v. Vail Resorts Inc , U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, case no. 1:26-cv-01191.
Four skiers have filed a class-action lawsuit against Broomfield-based Vail Resorts and Denver-based Alterra Mountain Co., accusing the companies of exploiting their grip on the industry to artificially inflate the cost of skiing and snowboarding across the country.



