EAGLE-Net needs to open up its nest

Apparently it’s easy to forget that taking money from the federal government – or any government – means you’re taking money from American taxpayers: you, me, your neighbor. It’s our money and therefore we have a right to know how it’s being spent, whether it’s being spent properly, and whether that spending is achieving its stated public goal.

But EAGLE-Net, the nonprofit alliance formed with federal funds during the Great Recession and charged with building a broadband network for underserved and rural Colorado communities, clearly has forgotten the public nature of its mission and its money.

When Colorado auditors and Colorado legislators have asked EAGLE-Net for numerous financial records to determine whether the agency is complying with its federal mandate and spending public funds properly, EAGLE-Net has taken the “just say no” approach.

SPONSORED CONTENT

Prioritizing mental health in hospice care

Prioritizing mental health support alongside physical comfort, Pathways hospice care aims to enhance the quality of life for patients and their families during one of life's most challenging transitions.

In the latest slap in the face to local elected officials, EAGLE-Net has said it doesn’t believe the financial records lawmakers have requested can be provided without violating its own fiduciary obligations.

Excuse me? We’re not talking about a receipt for a $150 lunch bill at a fancy restaurant. We’re talking about vouchers and invoices for $100.6 million in construction and equipment spending and the well-being of several Colorado communities that still lack the high-speed Internet access they were promised in 2010.

Maybe the agency is getting bad legal and public-relations advice. How else to explain why EAGLE-Net, a young entity whose board includes public school officials among others, has consistently circled the wagons in the face of criticism instead of providing the information we all have a right to examine.

It’s possible that EAGLE-Net has done what it says it is charged with doing, albeit a little late and at a high cost. But it’s hard to tell, and the agency’s behavior does nothing but increase public suspicion about its actions.

Early on, when Colorado Congressman Cory Gardner, a Republican from Yuma, and some of his GOP congressional colleagues began hounding EAGLE-Net over its high spending and low output, it looked as if the criticism was hyperbole driven by a partisan, political witch hunt.

But the longer EAGLE-Net’s stonewalling continues, and the more Democrats get involved, including the chairwoman of the state’s audit committee Rep. Angela Williams, D-Denver, the less likely it becomes a witch hunt and the more likely there is legitimate bipartisan concern over possible wrongdoing at the agency.

Game’s up, EAGLE-Net. Hire a new PR firm and a new attorney and hand over all of your financials. You’re biting the hand that’s feeding you: American taxpayers.